Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Burglary

Breaking and entering a residence for the intention of committing a crime or while lawfully within, commit a crime and to thereafter break out.

Breaking and entering a residence for the intention of committing a crime or while lawfully within, commit a crime and to thereafter break out.

At common law, as William Blackstone stated in his Commentaries on the Law of England, Volume 4 (1759), the original offence was limited to night-time occurrences and dwellings (residential premises). Night-time was determined to be when it was so dark that a person's face could not be readily discerned.

Contemporary criminal law developed by statute has, for the most part, removed the "night-time" distinction and, in some jurisdictions, such as in England, the "dwelling home" distinction.

England's Theft Act, 1968, defines burglary as:

"A person is guilty of burglary if he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser and with intent to commit any such offence as is mentioned ... below; or having entered any building or part of a building as a trespasser he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts or attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm.

"The offences referred to ... above are offences of stealing anything in the building or part of a building in question, of inflicting on any person therein any grievous bodily harm or raping any person  therein, and of doing unlawful damage to the building or anything therein."

Australia's Criminal Code, at ¶401, defines burglary as:

"A person who enters or is in the place of another person, without that other person’s consent, with intent to commit an offence in that place...."

burglary pictureNew York's Penal Code, at ¶140, defines burglary by degrees, the most severely punished, of the "first degree", being those which involve the use of a weapon (which, in England is distinguished as "aggravated burglary"), and the least serious as follows:

"A person is guilty of burglary in the third degree when he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime therein."

Some jurisdictions, such as Canada, prefer the term break and enter to "burglary" and even those that defer to burglary, such as New York, the term is limited to offences in regards to residence, deferring to the offence of criminal trespass to capture similar conduct on other private properties, such as commercial or educational premises.

Other jurisdictions present a comprehensive codification of the offence, such as this extract from California's Penal Code, at ¶459:

"Every person who enters any house, room, apartment, tenement, shop, warehouse, store, mill, barn, stable, outhouse or other building, tent, vessel ..., floating home ..., railroad car, locked or sealed cargo container, whether or not mounted on a vehicle, trailer coach ..., any house car ..., inhabited camper ..., vehicle ..., when the doors are locked, aircraft .., or mine or any underground portion thereof, with intent to commit grand or petit larceny or any felony is guilty of burglary.
"... (I)nhabited means currently being used for dwelling purposes, whether occupied or not. A house, trailer, vessel designed for habitation, or portion of a building is currently being used for dwelling purposes if, at the time of the burglary, it was not occupied solely because a natural or other disaster caused the occupants to leave the premises."

It is customary for common law jurisdictions to have created a separate offence for the possession of break-in or burglar tools.


RESEARCH AND FURTHER READING:


Are we missing anything? If you think there is a term that should be included, please send us the suggestion

  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • LawMag

Latest LagMag headlines:

H1N1 Law - Swine Law for a Swine Flu

In a state of public health law anarchy, professional hockey players receive a killer flu vaccine while infants and pregnant women wait.

The Death of the Common Law: Expiry date, 2100

Just about now, but for the economic might of the United States of America, the last funeral bell tolls of the common law would be fading.

Gretzky Law

The recent Phoenix Coyotes debacle, in which he left behind his job, is not the only time Wayne Gretzky has had to leave from the side exit of a courtroom.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top